Rapid recovery of fuel contaminated by environmental material, water or fire fighting surfactants is key to ensuring the availability of field vehicles in crisis situations. Specifically, the Seeker requires proposals describing technologies that are suitable for purification of hydrocarbon fuels from surfactants and surfactant/water/fuel emulsions. Fractionation or distillation is not an option.
This Challenge requires only a written proposal.
Fuel recovery solutions are already available, but do not enable recovery at sufficiently high throughput & in addition do not enable removal of synthetic surfactants that are commonly used in fire fighting foams. The Seeker wishes to receive proposals of technologies that could be implemented in the field as part of an overall fuel recovery solution. Fractionation or distillation is not an option. Many more details are available in the full challenge description.
This is a Theoretical Challenge that requires only a written proposal to be submitted. The Challenge award will be contingent upon theoretical evaluation of the proposal by the Seeker.
To receive an award, the Solvers will not have to transfer their exclusive IP rights to the Seeker. Instead, they will grant to the Seeker non-exclusive license to practice their solutions.
InnoCentive is the global innovation marketplace where creative minds solve some of the world's most important problems for cash awards up to $1 million. Commercial, governmental and humanitarian organizations engage with InnoCentive to solve problems that can impact humankind in areas ranging from the environment to medical advancements.
What is a Theoretical-Licensing Challenge?
An InnoCentive Theoretical Challenge builds upon an idea but is not yet a proof of concept. A solution to a Theoretical Challenge will solidify the Solver's concept with detailed descriptions, specifications and requirements necessary to bringing a good idea closer to becoming an actual product or service.
This Challenge is a Theoretical-Licensing Challenge, meaning that the Seeker is requesting non-exclusive rights to use the winning solution. By contrast, Theoretical-IP Transfer means that Solvers must relinquish all rights to the Intellectual Property (IP) for which they are awarded. For these forms of a Theoretical Challenge, Solvers that do not win retain the rights to their solution after the evaluation period is complete. The Seeker retains no rights to any IP not awarded.