The Seeker requires a comprehensive design of an irrigation system that offers comparable efficiency compared with sprinkler or drip irrigation systems. This challenge is not about novel sources of water or more efficient pumping of ground water – the scope is limited to more efficient distribution of available surface water. Low-cost and low-maintenance systems that use locally available materials are prioritized.
This Challenge requires only a written proposal.
The Seeker is looking for comprehensive designs of cost-effective irrigation mechanisms that it can distribute to small-scale farmers in Central America. The Seeker does not look to exclusively own any IP on awarded submissions, but it does need to be sure that they are free to distribute the designs within Central America.
This is a Theoretical Challenge that requires only a written proposal to be submitted. The Challenge award will be contingent upon theoretical evaluation of the proposal by the Seeker.
To receive an award, the Solvers will not have to transfer their exclusive IP rights to the Seeker. Instead, they will grant to the Seeker non-exclusive license to practice their solutions.
What is a Theoretical-Licensing Challenge?
An InnoCentive Theoretical Challenge builds upon an idea but is not yet a proof of concept. A solution to a Theoretical Challenge will solidify the Solver's concept with detailed descriptions, specifications and requirements necessary to bringing a good idea closer to becoming an actual product or service.
This Challenge is a Theoretical-Licensing Challenge, meaning that the Seeker is requesting non-exclusive rights to use the winning solution. By contrast, Theoretical-IP Transfer means that Solvers must relinquish all rights to the Intellectual Property (IP) for which they are awarded. For these forms of a Theoretical Challenge, Solvers that do not win retain the rights to their solution after the evaluation period is complete. The Seeker retains no rights to any IP not awarded.